Sunday, July 28, 2019


Going into this chapter I expected graphology to be more like forensic document examiners. Maybe maybe broad claims like ”They have a heavy hand, they must have a lot of stressors currently.” I did not expect this examination to go so far as to guess at a parent missing. Further, when the interviewer had his handwriting lead in a positive way, I wish they did not use that to cross check validity with the other two men. Most young men, and accomplished athletes probably like to be told they are the “man of action.” If the producers had Sheila read a more negative analysis, would the men have acted the same way? After all, the only person who said it their reading was spot on, was the only person who hadn’t come in contact with a false reading.

No comments:

Post a Comment